Basketball

NBA: Should We Value Youth or Experience?

|
Image for NBA: Should We Value Youth or Experience?

Between youth and experience, which one is more important to the success of the NBA? Each aspect has its own benefits, but there’s no single answer that applies to every situation. The simple truth is that both factors have an equal part to play in the future of basketball.

Afterall, a smorgasbord of related criteria has to be considered, from the age-related decline of performance to signature moves by the NBA’s current stars. All of these details influence the dynamic relationship between youth and wisdom in their own way.

For example, every player has a unique trajectory of performance. Some players peak in their rookie season, while others find their stride a bit further down the line. The youth are the ones who will usher in the next generation of basketball, but the ‘old guard’ are the ones who lead the way.

Finding a balanced perspective that takes both factors into account is the true challenge. This balance requires thorough knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages that each aspect brings to the table. Let’s take a closer look at both and identify what their strengths and weaknesses are.

Youth vs. experience

Basketball is an incredibly popular youth sport in the US. It becomes exceptionally competitive a lot sooner than you might think, and amateur players have to put in a tremendous amount of effort to set themselves apart from their peers.

In fact, youth basketball is so competitive that the NBA has deemed it necessary to issue multiple guidelines related to player wellbeing. For instance, did you know the NBA recommends that players younger than 14 should not specialize in basketball? Or that the age for draft selection was changed from 18 to 19?

These changes, some of which are fairly recent, all point to the fact that youth basketball provides ample grounding in fierce competition. Rookie players have more than enough talent and on-court experience, which means that skill level in other aspects of play become highly relevant.

Decision-making, movement efficiency, and tactical adaptability are but a few of the examples that come to mind. Gaining these skills on a professional level takes time, and coaches have to be willing to give promising players the game-time they need to improve.The trouble is, it’s entirely impractical to field a team that consists solely of inexperienced players, no matter how talented they are. Every squad needs veteran players, and the most successful teams are the ones who manage to find a working combination of fresh legs and experiential expertise.

Older players perform at a much higher level than their younger counterparts. Research data suggests that most players achieve peak performance around the age of 27, yet there are many players who buck this trend and have their best season at a far younger age.

When you value one factor over the other, the result is an unbalanced squad dynamic that will struggle against the chemistry of a well-balanced team. Age and experience have to be treated as two sides of the same coin. Each on their own is not enough to judge performance, but when they are combined, they represent a player’s true potential.

Endword

Forming a roster that holds the best of both worlds is easier said than done. Squad selectors have to be experienced in their own right, as they are the ones who have to decide when youth or wisdom is more important.

As we mentioned earlier, the only accurate inference to be made is that there’s no hard-and-fast rule. Players have to be judged on a case-by-case basis, with the benefit they bring to the team being the primary factor in squad selection.

A young player who makes poor decisions is no different from an older player who can’t keep up with the pace of the game. Both players are liabilities on a professional level, and there’s no good reason why either of them should remain on a first-team roster.

Ultimately, if you focus on talent and skill, age and experience become far less critical. If a 40-year-old player can hit 3-pointers with their eyes closed, what does their age matter? In the same way, why should a 19-year-old who can block with the best of them be judged by how young they are?

Every player is a unique individual. If we base our selections on age and experience, there’s far too little room for nuance and objectivity. On their own, these factors are too subjective, and if we focus on them too much, they prevent us from seeing the bigger picture.

Main Image Credit:

Embed from Getty Images

Share this article

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.